43 research outputs found
Bullying victimization due to racial, ethnic, citizenship and/or religious status: a systematic review
A resurgent climate of nationalism, racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and Islamophobia in many parts of the world has drawn attention to the risk of bullying victimization among racial, ethnic and/or religious minority youth. However, no attempt has yet been made to synthesize the literature on this topic to derive better understanding and guide future prevention and intervention efforts. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on individual, school, family, and community -level factors and outcomes associated with racist bullying victimization. Systematic searches of EBSCOhost, Scopus, ASSIA and Web of Science databases identified 73 articles that included quantitative and qualitative analyses on this topic. Overall, this review found that negative stereotypes and discrimination operating in school and community contexts put racial/ethnic minority, immigrant, and refugee youth at an increased risk of racist bullying victimization. The review also found that racist bullying victimization is associated with a wide range of negative outcomes including poor mental health, lower academic engagement, and an increased risk of involvement in delinquent behaviours, especially among older pupils. The review identified several gaps in the research, including the lack of adequate theorization and the infrequent consideration of potential mediators and moderators. Finally, the review outlined future directions, such as the need to study how intergroup processes influence racist bullying victimization
The Current Status of Social Risks on Educational Systems. An Analysis Through Social Media
Este trabajo ha sido publicado en las actas del citado congreso, y revisados los documentos donde ha sido publicado, no se muestran impedimentos legales para que pueda ser publicado el documento.Social Risk in education such as bullying, are usually invisible to teachers and parents, at all
educational levels. However, these risks remain a reality everywhere in the world, turning into a
problem that is rapidly globalizing due to the widespread access to the Internet. The Internet has
permeated our entire society and is now present in almost every activity. The education and most
aspects associated with it, such as Social Risks, are not exempt of this new form of communication
within our society. This has led to a significant increase in damage Social Risks can exhort on the
victims, due to several causes such as their capacity for dissemination, repetition and virality; greater
anonymity of aggressors and the chance for more people joining them; continuity over time even when
after school hours; display of intimacy before an endless crowd of people; ease of permanent control
through geolocation, control of online statuses and connections; and even the risk of easily
impersonating a victim. The first step to prevent these issues is to carry out a study on the current
state of Social Risks. An updated snapshot would allow to draw up action plans based on reliable data
and develop countermeasures to minimize the damage caused by current Social Risks to minors. The
objective of this work is to conduct a study on unsolicited data obtained from Social Media on three of
the most prominent Social Risks of our society, namely Bullying, Addictions and Xenophobia within the
field of education, with the aim of obtaining an updated snapshot of their current status. The study was
carried out during the second semester of 2017 and the first semester of 2018, quantifying the
presence and emotion of said risks in Social Media, determining the most relevant terms, as well as
the most used communication channels
Determinants of defending in prejudice-based bullying situations:findings from the GATE-BULL project
Recommended from our members
Using sport media contact to promote gender equality: counter-stereotypical gender perceptions and 2019 FIFA Women’s world cup
By relying on literature on counter-stereotypes and media contact, we investigated whether media exposure is associated with counter-stereotypical gender perceptions. Focusing on the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup, we recruited samples (N = 2,228) from eight competing countries (China, France, Germany, Italy, Scotland, Spain, England, US) across three continents. We hypothesized that exposure to media coverage of the competition’s counter-stereotypical female exemplars would be associated with increased counter-stereotypical perceptions of women. Results revealed that media exposure was associated with greater communion and agency attributed to women. In turn, communion and agency were associated (negatively and positively, respectively) with attribution of stereotypically male abilities (abilities to engage in stereotypically male academic disciplines and jobs) to women compared to men. No effects emerged for perceptions of stereotypically female characteristics. Gender moderated these effects, with associations being stronger among male than among female respondents. Theoretical and practical implications of findings are discussed.Immediate accessThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]
The Role of emotions in children's responses to intergroup contexts
EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo
Relazioni fra pari: Quando intrattenere rapporti positivi con un bambino in sedia a rotelle conduce ad emarginazione (Peer relations: When being on good terms with a wheel-chair child conduces to social exclusion)
The present study, using a structured interview, investigates whether very young children (N = 81,4-7 years old) show any preference for a non-disabled child with respect to a wheelchair bound child (direct preference). In addition, we focused on how a non-disabled child is perceived when he entertains positive relations with a disabled child (indirect preference). Finally, the amount of previous contact with wheelchair bound persons was measured. Results demonstrate high levels of direct preference toward non-disabled children. As for the indirect preference, it is shown that having positive relations with disabled children leads to rejection, negative evaluations and lower levels of perceived similarity. Contact did not affect direct preference, but was weakly related to the indirect preference: The higher the contact with wheel-chair bound persons the better the perception of someone playing with a disabled. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates how discrimination toward disabled children is pervasive and implies the social rejection of non-disabled children who get positively in contact with them. Results will be focused on how these investigated processes may impact on prejudice maintenance and reduction and implications for future research are discussed
Chinese Parents’ Attitudes Towards Children’s Defending Behaviour in Typical and Prejudice Based Bullying Contexts
No abstract available